Triple
T12062272
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marriage of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville |
E287201
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForInvalidationClaim |
P28641
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alleged precontract between Edward IV and Eleanor Butler |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alleged precontract between Edward IV and Eleanor Butler | Statement: [Marriage of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville, reasonForInvalidationClaim, alleged precontract between Edward IV and Eleanor Butler]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForInvalidationClaim Context triple: [Marriage of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville, reasonForInvalidationClaim, alleged precontract between Edward IV and Eleanor Butler]
-
A.
reasonForAnnulment
chosen
Indicates the specific cause or grounds on which a prior decision, agreement, or status is formally annulled or declared invalid.
-
B.
invalidated
Indicates that one entity has rendered another entity null, void, or no longer legally or logically effective.
-
C.
claimsInsultBy
Indicates that one entity asserts or alleges that another entity has insulted them.
-
D.
lostClaimTo
Indicates that one entity previously held a right or ownership over something but no longer retains that claim, often due to transfer, forfeiture, or invalidation.
-
E.
reasonForReversal
Indicates the specific cause or justification for undoing, overturning, or reversing a prior decision, action, or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902bda47c8190b94860b31df4a98c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.