Triple
T12029237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Defense of Marriage Act |
E286357
|
entity |
| Predicate | heldUnconstitutionalBecause |
P11308
|
FINISHED |
| Object | violated Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal liberty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: violated Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal liberty | Statement: [Defense of Marriage Act, heldUnconstitutionalBecause, violated Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal liberty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldUnconstitutionalBecause Context triple: [Defense of Marriage Act, heldUnconstitutionalBecause, violated Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal liberty]
-
A.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
B.
reasonUnconstitutional
chosen
Indicates that something is deemed to violate a constitution and is therefore considered legally unconstitutional.
-
C.
yearDeclaredUnconstitutional
Indicates the specific year in which a law, policy, or legal provision was officially ruled unconstitutional.
-
D.
subjectToConstitution
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or regulated by the rules and principles of a specific constitution.
-
E.
unconstitutionalProvisionCharacterization
Indicates that a particular legal provision is characterized or identified as being unconstitutional.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4669e48190b59246358b0383ab |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902b6ebbc8190b13c44a61c6f81b9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.