Triple
T1200810
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carry On |
E25775
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMusicalStyleElement |
P22764
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alternative rock |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alternative rock | Statement: [Carry On, hasMusicalStyleElement, alternative rock]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicalStyleElement Context triple: [Carry On, hasMusicalStyleElement, alternative rock]
-
A.
includesMusicalStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity encompasses, features, or incorporates a particular musical style as part of its content or character.
-
B.
hasSongStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
-
C.
hasMusicalForm
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or piece) is characterized by or structured according to a particular musical form.
-
D.
hasMusicalSettingsBy
Indicates that a work has been set to music or musically arranged by a specified creator or composer.
-
E.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49429f5ec8190a6a205eb0ae81e5e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bd9ec3488190afe35af54efae5e9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb5ed2b88190aab992913957e1cf |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.