Triple
T11986229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Michael Barber |
E285285
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdvisedOn |
P72206
|
FINISHED |
| Object | school system reform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: school system reform | Statement: [Michael Barber, hasAdvisedOn, school system reform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdvisedOn Context triple: [Michael Barber, hasAdvisedOn, school system reform]
-
A.
hasAdvising
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, counseling, or advisory support to another entity.
-
B.
hasAdvice
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
-
C.
hasCounsel
Indicates that one entity serves as a legal advisor or representative (counsel) for another entity.
-
D.
isAdvisoryOpinion
Indicates that a statement, decision, or document is an advisory opinion, offering non-binding guidance or interpretation rather than an enforceable ruling.
-
E.
hasAdvisoryJurisdictionUnder
Indicates that an authority or body holds the legal power to issue non-binding opinions or recommendations under a specified law, treaty, or framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab44a77c8190a652f4b27164e4ef |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d903acbb9081908fe7f8360057785c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902abca70819098291aa51b593708 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.