Triple
T11969929
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Armand Petitjean |
E284890
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lancôme brand |
E27682
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lancôme brand | Statement: [Armand Petitjean, notableWork, Lancôme brand]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lancôme brand Context triple: [Armand Petitjean, notableWork, Lancôme brand]
-
A.
Lancôme
chosen
Lancôme is a French luxury cosmetics and skincare brand renowned for its high-end perfumes, makeup, and beauty products.
-
B.
Dior Beauty
Dior Beauty is the cosmetics and fragrance division of the French luxury fashion house Dior, known for its high-end makeup, skincare, and perfumes.
-
C.
Armani Beauty
Armani Beauty is the cosmetics and fragrance line of the Giorgio Armani fashion house, known for its luxurious makeup, skincare, and signature perfumes.
-
D.
Yves Saint Laurent Beauté
Yves Saint Laurent Beauté is a luxury cosmetics and fragrance brand known for its high-end makeup, skincare, and iconic perfumes.
-
E.
Guerlain
Guerlain is a historic French luxury perfume, cosmetics, and skincare house renowned for its iconic fragrances and high-end beauty products.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2eaeb881909f7914758f859413 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9037bee54819085242a3ef3e286f9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f459691ff0819099282172933d2d81 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.