Triple

T11950855
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paramount Networks UK & Australia E284418 entity
Predicate usesBrandPortfolio P42926 FINISHED
Object Paramount Global brands LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paramount Global brands | Statement: [Paramount Networks UK & Australia, usesBrandPortfolio, Paramount Global brands]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesBrandPortfolio
Context triple: [Paramount Networks UK & Australia, usesBrandPortfolio, Paramount Global brands]
  • A. partOfBrandPortfolioOf
    Indicates that one brand is included within, and belongs to, the overall brand portfolio of another entity.
  • B. usesBrandCharacter
    Indicates that one entity employs or features another entity’s brand character (such as a mascot or branded persona) in its materials, products, or communications.
  • C. usedBrandOf
    Indicates that one entity made use of or operated an item, product, or service associated with a particular brand.
  • D. usedBrand chosen
    Indicates that an entity has utilized, applied, or operated a particular brand in some context.
  • E. supportsBrand
    Indicates that one entity endorses, promotes, or is compatible with a particular brand.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2db38c8190b1f0ed6663ef8ada completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d90364c2608190a3946c9595c71164 completed April 10, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8bb3e48e08190b2fee43af4f57323 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.