Triple
T11947863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | British |
E284347
|
entity |
| Predicate | colonialPresenceInSurat |
P102413
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trading factory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trading factory | Statement: [British, colonialPresenceInSurat, trading factory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonialPresenceInSurat Context triple: [British, colonialPresenceInSurat, trading factory]
-
A.
locatedInFormerColonialCity
Indicates that an entity is situated within a city that was formerly a colonial administrative or settlement center.
-
B.
underColonialRuleBy
Indicates that one entity was governed, controlled, or dominated as a colony by another political power.
-
C.
colonialHistoryIncludes
Indicates that one entity’s colonial history encompasses, involves, or includes the other entity as part of its colonial past.
-
D.
laterCapitalDuringBritishRule
Indicates that one entity served as the capital of the other at a later period specifically during British rule.
-
E.
hasColonialInfrastructure
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by infrastructure established or developed during a period of colonial rule by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2db38c8190b1f0ed6663ef8ada |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d90346825c8190ab4482a1fc8eed56 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8bb3e48e08190b2fee43af4f57323 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d8dd0ba0f88190b7d5e358c27ca184 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.