Triple

T119407
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Third World E2411 entity
Predicate originOfTerm P453 FINISHED
Object analogy with Third Estate in pre-revolutionary France LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: analogy with Third Estate in pre-revolutionary France | Statement: [Third World, originOfTerm, analogy with Third Estate in pre-revolutionary France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originOfTerm
Context triple: [Third World, originOfTerm, analogy with Third Estate in pre-revolutionary France]
  • A. etymologyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of etymological relationship that links a term to its linguistic origin or source.
  • B. etymology chosen
    Indicates the historical origin and development of a word or term, including its source language and form.
  • C. etymologicalLanguage
    Indicates the language from which a word or term is historically derived in its etymology.
  • D. coinedTerm
    Indicates that an entity originated and introduced a particular term or expression into use.
  • E. historicalOrigin
    Indicates the relationship by which one entity serves as the source, origin, or starting point in history for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2506c5428819085c28a8884790e29 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:18 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258e0b11c8190b7b5cf3c354c47ce completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25646d5088190a057989c32da3a90 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.