Triple

T1187705
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ecuadorian sucre E25284 entity
Predicate usedAsLegalTender P2878 FINISHED
Object 20th century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 20th century | Statement: [Ecuadorian sucre, usedAsLegalTender, 20th century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsLegalTender
Context triple: [Ecuadorian sucre, usedAsLegalTender, 20th century]
  • A. isLegalTenderFor chosen
    Indicates that a particular currency or form of money is officially recognized by a governing authority as valid payment for debts and financial transactions within a specified jurisdiction.
  • B. notLegalTenderIn
    Indicates that a form of money is not officially recognized as acceptable payment within a specified jurisdiction or region.
  • C. usedByDenomination
    Indicates that something (such as an object, practice, or concept) is employed or utilized by a particular religious denomination.
  • D. legalTenderUntil
    Indicates that a form of money is officially recognized as valid payment only up to a specified date or time.
  • E. legalTenderStatusAfter1933
    Indicates whether something retained or acquired the status of legal tender following the monetary and legal changes implemented after the year 1933.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49427d98881908646d6c63b8cea1e completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bd568cf481908d10cf19a3ce28f3 completed March 1, 2026, 10:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb5bacc481909e8dfd5215e4711a completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.