Triple

T11801147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 1869 E280627 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object RFC 1870 E772836 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1870 | Statement: [RFC 1869, relatedTo, RFC 1870]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1870
Context triple: [RFC 1869, relatedTo, RFC 1870]
  • A. RFC 1870 chosen
    RFC 1870 is an earlier Internet standards document that defined support for extended SMTP message sizes before being superseded by RFC 2821.
  • B. RFC 1670
    RFC 1670 is an early Internet standards document related to network protocols that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
  • C. RFC 1847
    RFC 1847 is an early Internet standards document that defined a general framework for security multiparts in MIME email, laying groundwork for later secure messaging specifications.
  • D. RFC 1889
    RFC 1889 was the original specification of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) for delivering audio and video over IP networks, later obsoleted by updated standards.
  • E. RFC 1730
    RFC 1730 is an early specification of the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) that was later superseded by RFC 3501.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab258b808190b1735835c841e3a4 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a5a4512c8190b7782e1dee053000 completed April 10, 2026, 7:24 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f166dbcb848190a5942ec00a2ca2f9 completed April 29, 2026, 2:03 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.