Triple
T11790635
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Luxembourg railway network |
E280377
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBorderCrossing |
P4105
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pétange |
E325804
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pétange | Statement: [Luxembourg railway network, hasBorderCrossing, Pétange]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pétange Context triple: [Luxembourg railway network, hasBorderCrossing, Pétange]
-
A.
Pétange
chosen
Pétange is a commune in southwestern Luxembourg known for its proximity to the borders with Belgium and France and its role as a local transport and industrial hub.
-
B.
Rocourt
Rocourt is a district of Liège in present-day Belgium, historically notable as the site of the 1746 Battle of Rocoux during the War of the Austrian Succession.
-
C.
Sarreguemines
Sarreguemines is a town in northeastern France near the German border, historically known for its ceramics and faience production.
-
D.
Comines
Comines is a town situated along the Lys River in the historic Flanders region on the border between France and Belgium.
-
E.
Berlencourt
Berlencourt is a small commune in northern France, located within the Nord department in the Hauts-de-France region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab258b808190b1735835c841e3a4 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a588d2c881909783c2d678c2a474 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:23 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f417604a7c819097a601880b88ea6a |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.