Triple

T11752646
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Burger Court E279444 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Miller v. California E425626 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miller v. California | Statement: [Burger Court, notableCase, Miller v. California]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Miller v. California
Context triple: [Burger Court, notableCase, Miller v. California]
  • A. Miller v. California chosen
    Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
  • B. Edwards v. California
    Edwards v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a California law restricting the bringing of indigent persons into the state, holding that such limits on interstate movement violated the Commerce Clause.
  • C. Bridges v. California
    Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
  • D. Gilbert v. California
    Gilbert v. California is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a defendant’s post-indictment lineup identification without counsel present violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
  • E. Whitney v. California
    Whitney v. California was a 1927 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a conviction under a state criminal syndicalism law and became historically significant for Justice Brandeis’s influential concurrence on free speech before later being overruled.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a509c2448190b0deb7ed29c3a73f completed April 10, 2026, 7:21 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f01a13550081909a26f57b30d68e03 completed April 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.