Triple

T11744613
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dickinson County E279245 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Chapman, Kansas E178311 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chapman, Kansas | Statement: [Dickinson County, contains, Chapman, Kansas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chapman, Kansas
Context triple: [Dickinson County, contains, Chapman, Kansas]
  • A. Chapman, Kansas chosen
    Chapman, Kansas is a small rural city in central Kansas known for its tight-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
  • B. Thayer, Kansas
    Thayer, Kansas is a small rural city located in Neosho County in southeastern Kansas, known for its agricultural surroundings and small-town community.
  • C. Hanston, Kansas
    Hanston, Kansas is a small rural city located in southwestern Kansas within Hodgeman County.
  • D. Cheney, Kansas
    Cheney, Kansas is a small city in south-central Kansas known for its proximity to Cheney Reservoir and its role as a local agricultural and recreational hub.
  • E. Schoenchen, Kansas
    Schoenchen, Kansas is a small rural city in central Kansas known for its German-Russian heritage and close-knit community.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a4f2a38c8190a682d8dae1ab9415 completed April 10, 2026, 7:21 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6fef311c4819094b6b08a62d3afb3 completed May 3, 2026, 7:53 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.