Triple
T1172273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eisai |
E24939
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedForIndication |
P23162
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lecanemab – Alzheimer’s disease |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lecanemab – Alzheimer’s disease | Statement: [Eisai, developedForIndication, Lecanemab – Alzheimer’s disease]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedForIndication Context triple: [Eisai, developedForIndication, Lecanemab – Alzheimer’s disease]
-
A.
indicatedFor
chosen
Indicates...that one entity (typically a treatment, procedure, or product) is recommended or appropriate for use in relation to another entity (such as a condition, symptom, or patient group).
-
B.
developedInCase
Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
-
C.
developed
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
-
D.
designationUsedFor
Indicates that a particular name, label, or title is employed to refer to or identify a specific entity or role.
-
E.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a494082a7c819095004f423f294a64 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bcecab688190b21a926874cd98d1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb5656948190b0b1d5446ad06005 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.