Triple
T1166577
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF RTCWEB Working Group |
E24812
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IETF working group |
C7112
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: IETF working group Context triple: [IETF RTCWEB Working Group, instanceOf, IETF working group]
-
A.
IETF Request for Comments
An IETF Request for Comments (RFC) is a formal, archival document series that specifies, proposes, or discusses Internet standards, protocols, procedures, and related technical and organizational topics.
-
B.
IETF document series
The IETF document series is a collection of technical publications, including RFCs and Internet-Drafts, that specify, document, and standardize protocols, procedures, and best practices for the Internet.
-
C.
IETF standard
An IETF standard is a formal, consensus-based technical specification developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force that defines protocols, formats, and best practices to ensure interoperability and reliable operation of the Internet.
-
D.
intergovernmental working group framework
An intergovernmental working group framework is a structured, collaborative arrangement through which multiple governments coordinate, negotiate, and develop joint policies, standards, or actions on shared issues.
-
E.
Internet standardization document
An Internet standardization document is an authoritative specification that defines technical protocols, formats, or practices to ensure interoperability and consistent behavior across the global Internet.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a494082a7c819095004f423f294a64 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.