Triple
T116444
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ASME Journal of Heat Transfer |
E2347
|
entity |
| Predicate | peerReviewType |
P1388
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single-blind peer review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single-blind peer review | Statement: [ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, peerReviewType, single-blind peer review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: peerReviewType Context triple: [ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, peerReviewType, single-blind peer review]
-
A.
peerReview
Indicates that one entity evaluates, critiques, or validates the work or performance of another entity, typically as an equal in expertise or status.
-
B.
peerReviewed
chosen
Indicates that a work, study, or submission has been evaluated and critiqued by qualified experts in the same field before acceptance or publication.
-
C.
publicationType
Indicates the specific category or format of a published work that characterizes how it is issued or presented.
-
D.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
-
E.
editorialProcess
Indicates the process by which content is reviewed, revised, and approved before publication or release.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2506c5428819085c28a8884790e29 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a257845c548190bfb49409988d1c57 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256456d908190b52c937fe6c4343f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.