Triple

T11633747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yates v. United States E276463 entity
Predicate overruledInPart P18493 FINISHED
Object Dennis v. United States (to the extent Dennis allowed broader application of the Smith Act) E147329 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dennis v. United States (to the extent Dennis allowed broader application of the Smith Act) | Statement: [Yates v. United States, overruledInPart, Dennis v. United States (to the extent Dennis allowed broader application of the Smith Act)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Dennis v. United States (to the extent Dennis allowed broader application of the Smith Act)
Context triple: [Yates v. United States, overruledInPart, Dennis v. United States (to the extent Dennis allowed broader application of the Smith Act)]
  • A. Debs v. United States
    Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
  • B. Dennis v. United States chosen
    Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
  • C. Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • D. Gitlow v. New York
    Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
    The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a25c0b00819095898d2b2445ecfb completed April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ee87b12044819098a858edb2b16689 completed April 26, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.