Triple
T11623935
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louisa Hawkins |
E276211
|
entity |
| Predicate | name |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Louisa Hawkins |
E276211
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Louisa Hawkins | Statement: [Louisa Hawkins, name, Louisa Hawkins]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Louisa Hawkins Context triple: [Louisa Hawkins, name, Louisa Hawkins]
-
A.
Louisa Hawkins
chosen
Louisa Hawkins was the first wife of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the famed British author and creator of Sherlock Holmes.
-
B.
Louisa Burton
Louisa Burton was the wife of influential 19th-century English architect and designer Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin.
-
C.
Louisa Mary Hodgson
Louisa Mary Hodgson was the wife of English industrialist Matthew Robinson Boulton, associated with the prominent Boulton family of manufacturers and entrepreneurs.
-
D.
Louisa Russell
Louisa Russell was a member of the prominent Russell family of the British aristocracy in the 18th century.
-
E.
Louisa Massey
Louisa Massey was an early 19th-century American woman honored for her family's prominence and influence on the Iowa frontier, for whom Louisa County, Iowa, is named.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a122a3708190ab6513dad4c4fde7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:05 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ee87745b388190a78958fa0c08b89b |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.