Triple
T1161971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dunajec River |
E24512
|
entity |
| Predicate | flowsThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nowy Targ |
E25018
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nowy Targ | Statement: [Dunajec River, flowsThrough, Nowy Targ]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nowy Targ Context triple: [Dunajec River, flowsThrough, Nowy Targ]
-
A.
Nowy Targ
chosen
Nowy Targ is a historic town in southern Poland, regarded as the main urban center of the Podhale region and a gateway to the Tatra Mountains.
-
B.
Tarnów
Tarnów is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, Renaissance architecture, and cultural heritage.
-
C.
Tarnobrzeg
Tarnobrzeg is a city in southeastern Poland known historically for its sulfur mining industry and location along the Vistula River.
-
D.
Przemyśl
Przemyśl is a historic city in southeastern Poland near the Ukrainian border, known for its strategic location, multicultural heritage, and well-preserved fortifications.
-
E.
Nowy Sącz
Nowy Sącz is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, cultural heritage, and role as a local economic and administrative center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a494060e148190abb42f971242c197 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bcb1915081908834ced85d09e299 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69aea815a69c8190b5caf24e351bb53a |
completed | March 9, 2026, 10:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.