Triple
T11569060
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nargothrond |
E274335
|
entity |
| Predicate | defensivePolicyUnderFinrod |
P100375
|
FINISHED |
| Object | secrecy and stealth |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: secrecy and stealth | Statement: [Nargothrond, defensivePolicyUnderFinrod, secrecy and stealth]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensivePolicyUnderFinrod Context triple: [Nargothrond, defensivePolicyUnderFinrod, secrecy and stealth]
-
A.
defends
Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
-
B.
defender
Indicates a relationship where one entity protects, guards, or supports another entity against threats, attacks, or criticism.
-
C.
defenderIn
Indicates that an entity serves as a defensive agent or protector within a specified context, situation, or domain.
-
D.
defenceHandledBy
Indicates that responsibility for managing or conducting a defence is assigned to or carried out by a particular agent or entity.
-
E.
defendsConcept
Indicates that one entity actively supports and argues in favor of a particular concept, idea, or theory, often in response to criticism or challenge.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae5ac3c81908d2b0a3a665665b2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d88dd543a48190b834abd8e8ae7b65 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85dc3fc2c8190bed7e2111301a77c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d87f2e67108190ac36bf47aac12fa8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.