Triple

T1155860
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grand Bench E23780 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court of Japan E2138 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of Japan | Statement: [Grand Bench, partOf, Supreme Court of Japan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court of Japan
Context triple: [Grand Bench, partOf, Supreme Court of Japan]
  • A. Supreme Court of Japan chosen
    The Supreme Court of Japan is the nation’s apex judicial body, responsible for final appeals and constitutional review within Japan’s legal system.
  • B. Tokyo High Court
    The Tokyo High Court is one of Japan’s major appellate courts, handling appeals from lower courts in the Tokyo region and playing a key role in the country’s judicial system.
  • C. Osaka High Court
    Osaka High Court is one of Japan’s major regional appellate courts, handling appeals and important cases from lower courts in the Kansai region.
  • D. Supreme Court of South Korea
    The Supreme Court of South Korea is the nation’s highest judicial authority, overseeing the interpretation of law and final appeals in the South Korean legal system.
  • E. Nagoya High Court
    Nagoya High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493f0d32c8190ac74bad3c87f2641 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bc912300819084c9c69783055a70 completed March 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ac6f139a008190a20f38330364dd2b completed March 7, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.