Triple

T11544285
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Standard format (Hearthstone) E273742 entity
Predicate balanceTarget P9277 FINISHED
Object competitive fairness LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: competitive fairness | Statement: [Standard format (Hearthstone), balanceTarget, competitive fairness]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: balanceTarget
Context triple: [Standard format (Hearthstone), balanceTarget, competitive fairness]
  • A. aimsToBalance chosen
    Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to bring multiple elements, forces, or conditions into a state of equilibrium.
  • B. forceBalance
    Indicates that the net forces acting on an entity or system are in equilibrium, resulting in no overall acceleration.
  • C. balancesInterest
    Indicates that an entity manages or adjusts multiple interests or priorities so that none is disproportionately favored over the others.
  • D. equalizingGoalBy
    Indicates that one entity has the objective of reducing differences or disparities between itself and another entity.
  • E. budgetTarget
    Indicates that a specific financial goal or spending limit has been set for a given entity, period, or activity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae4dfa48190a3ab0b19a159a3c5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d886e1d754819089f3b6be3404fa0b completed April 10, 2026, 5:13 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8087cbe7c819085680f3d67ccc978 completed April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.