Triple
T11529063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sibiu County |
E273370
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vâlcea County |
E274937
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vâlcea County | Statement: [Sibiu County, borders, Vâlcea County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Vâlcea County Context triple: [Sibiu County, borders, Vâlcea County]
-
A.
Vâlcea County
chosen
Vâlcea County is an administrative region in south-central Romania, known for its mountainous landscapes, spa resorts, and historical monasteries.
-
B.
Argeș County
Argeș County is an administrative region in southern Romania, known for encompassing part of the Southern Carpathians and including Romania’s highest peak, Moldoveanu.
-
C.
Dâmbovița County
Dâmbovița County is an administrative region in southern Romania, part of the historical region of Muntenia, with Târgoviște as its capital.
-
D.
Vrancea County
Vrancea County is an administrative region in eastern Romania, known for its seismic activity and wine-producing areas.
-
E.
Suceava County
Suceava County is an administrative region in northeastern Romania, encompassing a large part of the historical and cultural area of Bukovina.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae3fbec8190a14632a5df2538b6 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d883972b10819093bd09cf8406671c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6c0ce0a508190a2f44cbe812b5f17 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.