Triple

T11475049
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject D minor (BWV 1004) E272004 entity
Predicate typicalKeySignature P83458 FINISHED
Object one flat LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one flat | Statement: [D minor (BWV 1004), typicalKeySignature, one flat]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalKeySignature
Context triple: [D minor (BWV 1004), typicalKeySignature, one flat]
  • A. typicalScaleDegreePattern
    Indicates the usual or most common sequence of scale degrees that characterizes a particular melodic, harmonic, or stylistic pattern.
  • B. hasKeySignature chosen
    Indicates that one musical work, passage, or notation is associated with a specific key signature defining its set of sharps or flats.
  • C. typicalKey
    Indicates that the referenced key is the standard or most commonly used key associated with an entity or context.
  • D. typicalNotation
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or commonly used symbolic representation (notation) for another entity.
  • E. hasKeySignatureDistribution
    Indicates that there is a specific pattern or spread of key signatures associated with the entity, describing how frequently or prominently different key signatures occur.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae0c8d881908a5a360c0be3242e completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8294c8dc48190a515f83c99405a3b completed April 9, 2026, 10:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8086ecd6c81908f424864857762d6 completed April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:36 p.m.