Triple
T11468256
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 |
E271831
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiedBy |
P519
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953) |
E927191
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953) | Statement: [Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, clarifiedBy, SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953) Context triple: [Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, clarifiedBy, SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953)]
-
A.
SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953)
chosen
SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the private offering exemption under the Securities Act by focusing on whether offerees need the protections of registration.
-
B.
SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. is a landmark U.S. securities law case that broadly defined insider trading liability and the disclosure obligations of publicly traded companies under federal law.
-
C.
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal by limiting federal power under the Commerce Clause and declaring the National Industrial Recovery Act unconstitutional.
-
D.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
E.
United States v. Von's Grocery Co.
United States v. Von's Grocery Co. is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that struck down a supermarket merger for allegedly increasing market concentration, later criticized as an overreach in merger enforcement.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae0c8d881908a5a360c0be3242e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d822f74144819094479690c8151073 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e60415f6ac8190ad81ed0ef0a30e12 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:35 p.m.