Triple

T113682
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hebrews E2298 entity
Predicate associatedLanguage P4185 FINISHED
Object Hebrew language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hebrew language | Statement: [Hebrews, associatedLanguage, Hebrew language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedLanguage
Context triple: [Hebrews, associatedLanguage, Hebrew language]
  • A. influencedLanguage
    Indicates that one language has had an effect on the development, structure, or usage of another language.
  • B. languagesSpoken
    Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
  • C. isLanguageOf chosen
    Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
  • D. includesLanguage
    Indicates that one entity contains, supports, or makes use of a specified language as part of its content, functionality, or representation.
  • E. primaryLanguageOf
    Indicates that a specified language is the main or official language used by a particular entity (such as a person, organization, or region).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24fcdaeb48190a2d796677e4b3281 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25760af348190bf402089c240887d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2564417848190a8a8a38e97348963 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.