Triple

T11336271
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Manganiyar folk music E268478 entity
Predicate patronageTradition P40860 FINISHED
Object hereditary patron-client system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hereditary patron-client system | Statement: [Manganiyar folk music, patronageTradition, hereditary patron-client system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: patronageTradition
Context triple: [Manganiyar folk music, patronageTradition, hereditary patron-client system]
  • A. patronage
    Indicates a relationship where one party supports, sponsors, or protects another, often in exchange for loyalty, services, or influence.
  • B. patronageStyle chosen
    Indicates the manner or characteristic way in which support, sponsorship, or patronage is provided in a relationship.
  • C. patronageFocus
    Indicates the primary area, subject, or domain that is the focus of an entity’s support, sponsorship, or patronage.
  • D. patronageFrom
    Indicates a relationship where support, sponsorship, or backing is provided to someone or something by a patron.
  • E. traditionalPatron
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a customary or historically established patron or supporter of another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacb1f0881908c84a349fd1be047 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e9ff62c88190a089dd84e2ac1d17 completed April 9, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d787afe5a48190b8af1a3e19529641 completed April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:33 p.m.