Triple
T113239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Star of David |
E2289
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyUsedIn |
P591
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jewish mysticism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jewish mysticism | Statement: [Star of David, historicallyUsedIn, Jewish mysticism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyUsedIn Context triple: [Star of David, historicallyUsedIn, Jewish mysticism]
-
A.
historicallyUsedFor
Indicates that something served a particular function or purpose at some point in the past, even if it may no longer be used that way now.
-
B.
historicalPeriodOfUse
Indicates the time period during which something was in active use or commonly utilized.
-
C.
historicallyBorneBy
Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
-
D.
usedAt
chosen
Indicates that something is employed, applied, or utilized at a particular place, time, or context.
-
E.
historicallyPrizedFor
Indicates that something has been especially valued or esteemed for a particular quality, use, or significance in the past.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24fcdaeb48190a2d796677e4b3281 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256425a488190959d71e39e699d90 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.