Triple

T113079
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jewish diaspora E2286 entity
Predicate hasConceptualDebate P1783 FINISHED
Object whether diaspora is a permanent condition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether diaspora is a permanent condition | Statement: [Jewish diaspora, hasConceptualDebate, whether diaspora is a permanent condition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConceptualDebate
Context triple: [Jewish diaspora, hasConceptualDebate, whether diaspora is a permanent condition]
  • A. debatedAt
    Indicates that a debate or formal discussion involving the subject took place at the specified location or event.
  • B. contestedBy
    Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
  • C. controversy chosen
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • D. hasConcept
    Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
  • E. limitsDebateTime
    Indicates that one entity imposes a restriction on the amount of time another entity is allowed to engage in debate or discussion.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24fcdaeb48190a2d796677e4b3281 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a256425a488190959d71e39e699d90 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.