Triple
T11296348
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Silver Award |
E267460
|
entity |
| Predicate | teamworkOption |
P98370
|
FINISHED |
| Object | may be earned individually |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: may be earned individually | Statement: [Silver Award, teamworkOption, may be earned individually]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: teamworkOption Context triple: [Silver Award, teamworkOption, may be earned individually]
-
A.
teamUpWith
Indicates forming a cooperative partnership or alliance with another entity to work together toward a shared goal.
-
B.
teamBased
Indicates that an activity, process, or structure is organized around collaboration within a group or team rather than by individuals working independently.
-
C.
team
Indicates that multiple entities are grouped together as a collaborative unit working toward shared goals or tasks.
-
D.
teamAction
Indicates an action that is performed collectively by a group functioning as a team.
-
E.
integratedTeam
Indicates that multiple parties work together as a single, coordinated unit with shared goals, processes, and responsibilities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac993a08190a6f36445ebaf9a43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e9a262e08190a7c1eacbc6019496 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d787a6ca2c8190afdc24b61ccd3f8a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d796d049e88190a9fd7508f477f541 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.