Triple
T11292781
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gracie Gold |
E267367
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPubliclyDiscussed |
P3281
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mental health in elite sports |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mental health in elite sports | Statement: [Gracie Gold, hasPubliclyDiscussed, mental health in elite sports]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPubliclyDiscussed Context triple: [Gracie Gold, hasPubliclyDiscussed, mental health in elite sports]
-
A.
discussedAs
Indicates that one entity is talked about, treated, or examined in terms of another entity, often as an example, case, or framing concept.
-
B.
hasSpokenAbout
chosen
Indicates that one entity has verbally expressed, discussed, or mentioned another entity or topic.
-
C.
containsDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or features a discussion, treatment, or consideration of another entity as a topic or subject.
-
D.
discussed
Indicates that one entity talked about, examined, or debated a topic, issue, or other entity with someone else.
-
E.
influencedDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity had an effect on the way another entity was discussed, framed, or debated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac993a08190a6f36445ebaf9a43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e989fdac81909a4a75f1f68b55c6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d787a6ca2c8190afdc24b61ccd3f8a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.