Triple
T11288546
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edinburgh Southern |
E267261
|
entity |
| Predicate | previousRepresentativeTermStart |
P70804
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2011 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 | Statement: [Edinburgh Southern, previousRepresentativeTermStart, 2011]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousRepresentativeTermStart Context triple: [Edinburgh Southern, previousRepresentativeTermStart, 2011]
-
A.
currentRepresentativeSince
Indicates the date or time from which an entity has been serving as the current representative of another entity.
-
B.
previousMPStartYear
chosen
Indicates the year in which the subject’s immediately preceding term as a Member of Parliament began.
-
C.
precededByOfficeHolderTermStart
Indicates that the start of one office holder’s term occurs after and is directly preceded by the start of another office holder’s term.
-
D.
previousRepresentativeParty
Indicates that a given party previously served as the representative party for another entity before the current representative was in place.
-
E.
startOfCurrentApportionment
Indicates the point in time when the current apportionment period or allocation arrangement begins.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac993a08190a6f36445ebaf9a43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e98875a08190b8509fe55e49d52d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d787a240588190aa097298f951c915 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.