Triple
T11280075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Birmingham New Street – Northampton |
E267039
|
entity |
| Predicate | connectsTown |
P845
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Northampton |
E81821
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Northampton | Statement: [Birmingham New Street – Northampton, connectsTown, Northampton]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Northampton Context triple: [Birmingham New Street – Northampton, connectsTown, Northampton]
-
A.
Northampton
chosen
Northampton is a historic market town and the county town of Northamptonshire in the East Midlands of England.
-
B.
Northampton
Northampton is a small, culturally vibrant city in western Massachusetts known for its progressive community, arts scene, and historic New England character.
-
C.
Ipswich
Ipswich is a historic town and port in Suffolk, England, known as one of the country’s oldest continuously inhabited settlements.
-
D.
Ipswich
Ipswich is a historic city in South East Queensland, Australia, known for its heritage architecture and role as a major residential and industrial hub west of Brisbane.
-
E.
Hertford
Hertford is a historic market town and the county town of Hertfordshire in southern England.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac8c2f48190ad0596f1f89f0470 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e969b3448190940e2bd499d2d7de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e5258cc5208190be268ac6a82c9419 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:31 p.m.