Triple
T112684
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yiddish |
E2281
|
entity |
| Predicate | isLiturgicalLanguageOf |
P3115
|
FINISHED |
| Object | some Hasidic communities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: some Hasidic communities | Statement: [Yiddish, isLiturgicalLanguageOf, some Hasidic communities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isLiturgicalLanguageOf Context triple: [Yiddish, isLiturgicalLanguageOf, some Hasidic communities]
-
A.
languageOfWorship
chosen
Indicates the language in which religious worship, rituals, or liturgical practices are conducted.
-
B.
isLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
-
C.
languageOfCeremony
Indicates the language in which a ceremony is conducted or officially performed.
-
D.
isOfficialMinorityLanguageIn
Indicates that a language has formal, legally recognized minority-language status within a specified political or geographic entity.
-
E.
hasLanguageOfScripture
Indicates that an entity’s scriptural or sacred texts are written or expressed in a specified language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24fcdaeb48190a2d796677e4b3281 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256425a488190959d71e39e699d90 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.