Triple
T1126602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tshivenda |
E24733
|
entity |
| Predicate | countryLegalStatus |
P2250
|
FINISHED |
| Object | recognized in the Constitution of South Africa |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recognized in the Constitution of South Africa | Statement: [Tshivenda, countryLegalStatus, recognized in the Constitution of South Africa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: countryLegalStatus Context triple: [Tshivenda, countryLegalStatus, recognized in the Constitution of South Africa]
-
A.
hasLegalStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
B.
legalStatusInManyCountries
Indicates that the subject has a particular legal classification or standing that is recognized across numerous countries.
-
C.
countryStatus
Indicates the political or legal condition of a country, such as its sovereignty, recognition, or current state in international or domestic contexts.
-
D.
statusInUnitedStates
Indicates the legal or official standing that an entity holds within the jurisdiction of the United States.
-
E.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4940712c88190aa244f3fc6070a65 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb4749ac8190b0fbddac2e9b2586 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.