Triple
T11257328
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jurek v. Texas |
E266471
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jurek v. Texas |
E266471
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jurek v. Texas | Statement: [Jurek v. Texas, fullCaseName, Jurek v. Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jurek v. Texas Context triple: [Jurek v. Texas, fullCaseName, Jurek v. Texas]
-
A.
Jurek v. Texas
chosen
Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
Moore v. Texas
Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
-
C.
Aguilar v. Texas
Aguilar v. Texas is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a two-pronged test for evaluating the sufficiency of informants’ tips in supporting probable cause for search warrants.
-
D.
Zurawski v. State of Texas
Zurawski v. State of Texas is a high-profile lawsuit in which women denied medically necessary abortions challenge the state’s near-total abortion ban as unconstitutional and dangerously restrictive to pregnant patients’ health.
-
E.
Sossamon v. Texas
Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac7953c8190b82caf9d7640fdf9 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e935b85c819085e1abf2dd4099c5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e4f410cb508190bb0ceab51075eec5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:31 p.m.