Triple

T1124669
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Margo Channing E24691 entity
Predicate relationshipToEveHarrington P25236 FINISHED
Object mentor-turned-rival LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mentor-turned-rival | Statement: [Margo Channing, relationshipToEveHarrington, mentor-turned-rival]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToEveHarrington
Context triple: [Margo Channing, relationshipToEveHarrington, mentor-turned-rival]
  • A. relationshipToLaureyWilliams
    Indicates the nature or type of relational connection an entity has specifically to Laurey Williams.
  • B. relationToProvidence
    Indicates a relationship or connection that something or someone has to Providence, such as origin, location, affiliation, or relevance.
  • C. relationshipToAuntEller
    Indicates the specific familial relationship that an entity has to Aunt Eller (e.g., whether and how they are related to her).
  • D. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • E. portraysRelationship
    Indicates that one entity depicts, represents, or illustrates a relationship between other entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4940712c88190aa244f3fc6070a65 completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c completed March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb4749ac8190b0fbddac2e9b2586 completed March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bc47fce48190825d3a877251f789 completed March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.