Triple

T1123889
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wi‑Fi 5 E24674 entity
Predicate supportsBeamforming P203 FINISHED
Object explicit beamforming LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: explicit beamforming | Statement: [Wi‑Fi 5, supportsBeamforming, explicit beamforming]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsBeamforming
Context triple: [Wi‑Fi 5, supportsBeamforming, explicit beamforming]
  • A. supportsMultiRoomAudio
    Indicates that the subject is capable of playing synchronized audio across multiple rooms or speakers simultaneously.
  • B. supportsFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
  • C. hasTypicalBeam
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a characteristic or standard type of beam it commonly uses or possesses.
  • D. beamUse
    Indicates the action of directing or emitting a beam (such as light, energy, or signal) from one entity toward a target or in a specific direction.
  • E. supportsInstrument
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or functionality that enables another entity (the instrument) to operate or be used effectively.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4940712c88190aa244f3fc6070a65 completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c completed March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb4749ac8190b0fbddac2e9b2586 completed March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.