Triple
T1121631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St. Clair County, Alabama |
E24624
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county in Alabama |
C4699
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: county in Alabama Context triple: [St. Clair County, Alabama, instanceOf, county in Alabama]
-
A.
county in Michigan
A county in Michigan is an administrative subdivision of the state that provides local government services, governance, and regional organization for the communities and municipalities within its geographic boundaries.
-
B.
county in the United States
chosen
A county in the United States is a local administrative and political subdivision of a state (or equivalent), typically responsible for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, record-keeping, and infrastructure management for the communities within its boundaries.
-
C.
county in Florida
A county in Florida is an administrative subdivision of the state that has defined geographic boundaries, a local government, and responsibilities for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, and infrastructure to its residents.
-
D.
county in Texas
A county in Texas is a local governmental subdivision of the state that provides regional administration, services, and law enforcement for the residents within its defined geographic boundaries.
-
E.
county of Kentucky
A county of Kentucky is a local governmental and geographic subdivision of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, responsible for regional administration, services, and jurisdiction within its defined boundaries.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4940712c88190aa244f3fc6070a65 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.