Triple
T11216058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 484 |
E265441
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
PEP 526
PEP 526 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced a standard syntax for variable and attribute type annotations in Python.
|
E911262
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: PEP 526 | Statement: [PEP 484, relatedTo, PEP 526]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: PEP 526 Context triple: [PEP 484, relatedTo, PEP 526]
-
A.
PEP 570
PEP 570 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced positional-only parameters to Python function definitions, formalizing a syntax for arguments that must be passed by position.
-
B.
PEP 572
PEP 572 is the Python proposal that introduced the “walrus operator” (:=) for assignment expressions, allowing assignment within larger expressions.
-
C.
PEP 578
PEP 578 is a Python enhancement proposal that introduces a security audit hook framework to help monitor and control runtime events in Python applications.
-
D.
PEP 590
PEP 590 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced the "vectorcall" protocol to speed up and standardize function calls in CPython.
-
E.
PEP 626
PEP 626 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that precisely defines how Python should map executed bytecode instructions to source code lines, improving debugging, coverage measurement, and tooling accuracy.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: PEP 526 Triple: [PEP 484, relatedTo, PEP 526]
Generated description
PEP 526 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced a standard syntax for variable and attribute type annotations in Python.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: PEP 526 Target entity description: PEP 526 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced a standard syntax for variable and attribute type annotations in Python.
-
A.
PEP 570
PEP 570 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced positional-only parameters to Python function definitions, formalizing a syntax for arguments that must be passed by position.
-
B.
PEP 572
PEP 572 is the Python proposal that introduced the “walrus operator” (:=) for assignment expressions, allowing assignment within larger expressions.
-
C.
PEP 578
PEP 578 is a Python enhancement proposal that introduces a security audit hook framework to help monitor and control runtime events in Python applications.
-
D.
PEP 590
PEP 590 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced the "vectorcall" protocol to speed up and standardize function calls in CPython.
-
E.
PEP 626
PEP 626 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that precisely defines how Python should map executed bytecode instructions to source code lines, improving debugging, coverage measurement, and tooling accuracy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac59460819089b9848b27f57848 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8e8eef48190932a85784ce15c86 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e49762e3188190ba3c0e01cf04f6a1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69e49d37989881909c7e75ddfff06726 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69e49f41a1f8819087cc15527dc7ff63 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:30 p.m.