Triple
T11210381
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Huet unification algorithm |
E265288
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Robinson unification algorithm
The Robinson unification algorithm is the foundational procedure in automated theorem proving that computes the most general unifier of logical expressions, forming the basis of first-order logic resolution methods.
|
E911972
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Robinson unification algorithm | Statement: [Huet unification algorithm, relatedTo, Robinson unification algorithm]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Robinson unification algorithm Context triple: [Huet unification algorithm, relatedTo, Robinson unification algorithm]
-
A.
Nelson–Oppen combination method
The Nelson–Oppen combination method is a decision procedure framework that combines satisfiability solvers for different first-order theories to determine the satisfiability of formulas in their union.
-
B.
Knuth–Bendix completion algorithm
The Knuth–Bendix completion algorithm is a procedure in term rewriting and automated theorem proving that transforms a set of equations into a confluent rewriting system, enabling decision of word problems in algebraic structures.
-
C.
Davis–Putnam algorithm
The Davis–Putnam algorithm is a pioneering procedure in automated theorem proving and propositional logic satisfiability that laid foundational groundwork for modern SAT solvers.
-
D.
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
"A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory" is a seminal 1960 paper by Martin Davis and Hilary Putnam that introduced the Davis–Putnam algorithm, laying foundational work for automated theorem proving and propositional satisfiability.
-
E.
"The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures"
"The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures" is Stephen Cook’s landmark 1971 paper that introduced the concept of NP-completeness and proved the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) to be NP-complete, laying the foundation for modern computational complexity theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Robinson unification algorithm Triple: [Huet unification algorithm, relatedTo, Robinson unification algorithm]
Generated description
The Robinson unification algorithm is the foundational procedure in automated theorem proving that computes the most general unifier of logical expressions, forming the basis of first-order logic resolution methods.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Robinson unification algorithm Target entity description: The Robinson unification algorithm is the foundational procedure in automated theorem proving that computes the most general unifier of logical expressions, forming the basis of first-order logic resolution methods.
-
A.
Nelson–Oppen combination method
The Nelson–Oppen combination method is a decision procedure framework that combines satisfiability solvers for different first-order theories to determine the satisfiability of formulas in their union.
-
B.
Knuth–Bendix completion algorithm
The Knuth–Bendix completion algorithm is a procedure in term rewriting and automated theorem proving that transforms a set of equations into a confluent rewriting system, enabling decision of word problems in algebraic structures.
-
C.
Davis–Putnam algorithm
The Davis–Putnam algorithm is a pioneering procedure in automated theorem proving and propositional logic satisfiability that laid foundational groundwork for modern SAT solvers.
-
D.
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
"A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory" is a seminal 1960 paper by Martin Davis and Hilary Putnam that introduced the Davis–Putnam algorithm, laying foundational work for automated theorem proving and propositional satisfiability.
-
E.
"The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures"
"The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures" is Stephen Cook’s landmark 1971 paper that introduced the concept of NP-completeness and proved the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) to be NP-complete, laying the foundation for modern computational complexity theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aac59460819089b9848b27f57848 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8d6f5d4819086dcb776a0d469e8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e49747ec288190bc3e826b6de7f6f2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69e49c0a92b08190ac5debb7d67ca776 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:10 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69e49e8dc4ec81908d0defe77827d197 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:30 p.m.