Triple
T1119746
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | expected utility theory |
E11182
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theory of rational choice under risk |
C6851
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: theory of rational choice under risk Context triple: [expected utility theory, instanceOf, theory of rational choice under risk]
-
A.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
-
B.
probabilist
A probabilist is a mathematician or scientist who studies probability theory, focusing on the analysis and modeling of random phenomena and uncertainty.
-
C.
work in social choice theory
Work in social choice theory examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions, analyzing the fairness, consistency, and implications of different voting and choice mechanisms.
-
D.
decision instrument
A decision instrument is a structured tool or framework used to systematically evaluate options and guide the selection of an optimal course of action based on defined criteria.
-
E.
alternating-offers bargaining game
An alternating-offers bargaining game is a strategic interaction in which two or more parties sequentially propose and respond to offers over how to divide a surplus, with the possibility of delay affecting payoffs and outcomes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493252a648190ac48f8742474a5e8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.