Triple
T1119745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | expected utility theory |
E11182
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | normative theory of choice |
C5014
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: normative theory of choice Context triple: [expected utility theory, instanceOf, normative theory of choice]
-
A.
work in social choice theory
Work in social choice theory examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions, analyzing the fairness, consistency, and implications of different voting and choice mechanisms.
-
B.
normative ethical theory
A normative ethical theory is a systematic framework that aims to determine which actions are morally right or wrong and why, by providing principles or rules to guide moral decision-making.
-
C.
socio-economic theory
Socio-economic theory is a conceptual framework that analyzes how economic activity, social structures, and power relations interact to shape the distribution of resources, opportunities, and outcomes in society.
-
D.
consequentialist theory
chosen
A consequentialist theory is an ethical framework that judges the rightness or wrongness of actions solely by their outcomes or consequences, aiming to maximize overall good or minimize harm.
-
E.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493252a648190ac48f8742474a5e8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.