Triple
T1119039
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Katyn massacre |
E11166
|
entity |
| Predicate | justificationClaimedByPerpetrator |
P11285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alleged security concerns |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alleged security concerns | Statement: [Katyn massacre, justificationClaimedByPerpetrator, alleged security concerns]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: justificationClaimedByPerpetrator Context triple: [Katyn massacre, justificationClaimedByPerpetrator, alleged security concerns]
-
A.
justification
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
B.
justified
Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
-
C.
perpetratedBy
Indicates that an action, event, or wrongdoing was carried out or caused by a particular agent or entity.
-
D.
rejectedJustification
Indicates that a proposed justification or reason offered in a context (e.g., argument, decision, or claim) has been evaluated and not accepted as valid or sufficient.
-
E.
guiltyOf
Indicates that an entity has been judged or determined to have committed a particular offense, crime, or wrongful act.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493252a648190ac48f8742474a5e8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc4bc21881909dcfe628f59f3e8c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb4562f48190831e959f5f309956 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.