Triple
T11129155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quelle |
E263231
|
entity |
| Predicate | timeOfCompositionHypothesized |
P6964
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1st century CE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1st century CE | Statement: [Quelle, timeOfCompositionHypothesized, 1st century CE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: timeOfCompositionHypothesized Context triple: [Quelle, timeOfCompositionHypothesized, 1st century CE]
-
A.
dateOfComposition
chosen
Indicates the calendar date or time period when a particular work was created or composed.
-
B.
compositionEndTime
Indicates the point in time at which a composition or creative work is considered to have been completed.
-
C.
hasUnknownExactDateOfComposition
Indicates that the precise date when a work was composed is not known.
-
D.
timeOfCodification
Indicates the specific point in time at which something (such as a rule, law, or concept) was formally codified or recorded.
-
E.
possiblePlaceOfComposition
Indicates that a location is a plausible or hypothesized place where a work was composed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9c0ba08190bbd19c217489b755 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e830e804819097fcc3826d84dab8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7441efe948190ae4ab020121e169d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.