Triple
T11129152
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quelle |
E263231
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForHypothesis |
P14769
|
FINISHED |
| Object | material shared by Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: material shared by Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark | Statement: [Quelle, reasonForHypothesis, material shared by Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForHypothesis Context triple: [Quelle, reasonForHypothesis, material shared by Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark]
-
A.
proposesHypothesis
Indicates that one entity puts forward a tentative explanation or hypothesis for consideration regarding another entity or phenomenon.
-
B.
functionHypothesis
chosen
Indicates that an entity is proposed or assumed to serve as a function or functional explanation for another entity or phenomenon.
-
C.
statedReason
Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
-
D.
reasonWritten
Indicates that one entity is the reason or motivation for which another entity was written or authored.
-
E.
declineHypothesis
Indicates that a previously proposed hypothesis is being rejected or considered no longer valid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9c0ba08190bbd19c217489b755 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e830e804819097fcc3826d84dab8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d7441efe948190ae4ab020121e169d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:28 p.m.