Triple

T11099921
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Patriarch of Antioch E262475 entity
Predicate hasMultipleSuccessions P97277 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Patriarch of Antioch, hasMultipleSuccessions, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMultipleSuccessions
Context triple: [Patriarch of Antioch, hasMultipleSuccessions, yes]
  • A. hasSuccession
    Indicates that one entity follows or replaces another in a sequence, order, or position, forming a succession relationship between them.
  • B. hasLineOfSuccession
    Indicates that one entity is designated to follow or replace another in a defined order of succession.
  • C. hasBusinessSuccession
    Indicates that one business entity continues, replaces, or inherits the operations, rights, or obligations of another business over time.
  • D. supportedSuccessionOf
    Indicates that one entity actively endorsed or helped bring about the transfer of power, position, or role from a predecessor to a successor.
  • E. hasGenerations
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with one or more successive generational levels or cohorts derived from it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9a40d88190a373e2c7e48285db completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d79a29ee6c819092bc0da3f9255389 completed April 9, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d7441aa3548190b92dbde57841c135 completed April 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d750ca52ec8190a559432a5de106fd completed April 9, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:27 p.m.