Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Kleppe v. New Mexico | Statement: [Camfield v. United States, relatedCase, Kleppe v. New Mexico]

Target entity: Kleppe v. New Mexico
Context triple: [Camfield v. United States, relatedCase, Kleppe v. New Mexico]

• A. Kleppe v. New Mexico chosen
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• B. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• C. Arizona v. Johnson
  Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
• D. Texas v. New Mexico
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• E. Keech v Sandford
  Keech v Sandford is an 18th-century English trust law case establishing the strict fiduciary duty of loyalty, holding that trustees cannot personally profit from opportunities arising from their position.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.