Triple

T1103643
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tecfidera E25438 entity
Predicate hasRouteOfAdministration P23149 FINISHED
Object oral LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oral | Statement: [Tecfidera, hasRouteOfAdministration, oral]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRouteOfAdministration
Context triple: [Tecfidera, hasRouteOfAdministration, oral]
  • A. commonRouteOfAdministration
    Indicates that two or more substances share the same typical method or pathway by which they are administered to a subject.
  • B. typeOfAdministration
    Indicates the specific form or system of administration applied to or governing an entity.
  • C. notAdministeredThrough
    Indicates that a substance, treatment, or intervention is explicitly not delivered or applied via a specified route or method.
  • D. administeredIn
    Indicates that an action, treatment, or process is carried out or applied within a specific location, context, or jurisdiction.
  • E. administeredWithin
    Indicates that one entity is given, applied, or carried out inside the spatial or temporal bounds of another entity (such as a location, container, or time period).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49428d4448190b3b36991ceae87ce completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b9c375848190baec4d534f489616 completed March 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b7472c848190b0643872f67084a2 completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b7da38888190a118ef20ce4ae9aa completed March 1, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.