Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation | Statement: [Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, plaintiff, A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation]

Target entity: A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation
Context triple: [Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, plaintiff, A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation]

• A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
  Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal by limiting federal power under the Commerce Clause and declaring the National Industrial Recovery Act unconstitutional.
• B. Lochner v. New York
  Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
• C. Hammer v. Dagenhart
  Hammer v. Dagenhart was a 1918 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down federal child labor regulations under the Commerce Clause, later repudiated as a symbol of restrictive interpretations of federal power.
• D. United States v. Butler
  United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
• E. United States v. Darby
  United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation
Triple: [Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, plaintiff, A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation]

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation was a New York poultry business whose challenge to federal regulations led to the landmark 1935 Supreme Court decision limiting New Deal economic controls and narrowing the scope of the Commerce Clause.

Target entity: A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation
Target entity description: A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation was a New York poultry business whose challenge to federal regulations led to the landmark 1935 Supreme Court decision limiting New Deal economic controls and narrowing the scope of the Commerce Clause.

• A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States chosen
  Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal by limiting federal power under the Commerce Clause and declaring the National Industrial Recovery Act unconstitutional.
• B. Lochner v. New York
  Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
• C. Hammer v. Dagenhart
  Hammer v. Dagenhart was a 1918 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down federal child labor regulations under the Commerce Clause, later repudiated as a symbol of restrictive interpretations of federal power.
• D. United States v. Butler
  United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
• E. United States v. Darby
  United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
• F. None of above.